Dovina3 Apr 2005
You did not address my first paragraph. I assume you did not because it destroys your argument that I had not read your previous comment correctly. That comment was an attempt to deceive me into thinking I had overlooked something that I did not overlook. It displays the kind of argument I can expect in the other matters we are discussing.
At least we agree that truth can come from an unreliable source. I have not confused 0 correlation and negative correlation. I donât agree that correlation is the issue. The perception of unlikeliness of truth coming from the âunreliableâ source is the basis of closed mindedness. Any real correlation is difficult if not impossible to determine.
Your hypothetical race of Liars could not communicate with each other in the practicalities of ordinary life because of the cumbersome nature of the process. By the time you extract from your man what he had for breakfast, it would be lunch time or dinner time and purpose for asking would have passed.