poemranker ::Moonlight Paradox Riddle Answered by Glasseyez

DetailsThe poem, its numbers, and the conversation.

Free verse № 138693

Moonlight Paradox Riddle Answered

Member since 2006 · Posted 9 Feb 2006 · Edited 10 Feb 2006 · 3 comments

In sum: the [2nd Stanza] (by means of having the same word order from beginning to end) was the Paradox inside the riddle, and that [Everything exists in relativity with something else] was the “moonlight paradox” that was explained and personified by the 2nd stanza. However, the paradox inside of itself is that you could not get to a point of absolute understanding of this moonlight paradox of relativity until you realize the inclusive complexity of the 2nd Stanza, which is: When read from either direction (beginning to end- ending to beginning) it has the same precise word order, while maintaining an entirely different enlightening perspective. Along with the paragraph giving you a sense of relativity in it of itself, the examples given where also explanations of relativity, or Yin and Yang so to speak. The clues inside the 1st and 3rd stanzas where to point the reader into the direction of the 2nd stanza, and how to find the true meaning of it. doing this properly gave the reader direction to find the paradox, and how to decode it to find the absolute paradox, the �moonlight paradox�. The reason for the name of the title has to do with the way the moon is somewhat a metaphor for the light given by the sun. it is a refraction, or bending in the truth, but still the same overall meaning. “light” considered the most common metaphor for understanding is what I hoped the reader to search for, not only in the riddle but inside themselves in realization that all things are equal and perfect it is just a matter of perspective. I hope that now people see there is no good and bad, and if there is it is only because one will create the image of the other. This is true relativity. All existence is for the purpose of some other existence. Reason for writing: I wanted to tell everyone that they have purpose, meaning, and life supporting capabilities even if they do not think so. It is not a matter of opinion, it’s a matter of scientific deduction and the laws of relativity. Your existence is theoretical proof that there is something out there that needs you to maintain existence because we are sustaining the 2. The great I AM, God, Ala, Yahweh, Toa, whatever title you want to give to the entity that sustains us or inside of all creation, must need us to sustain It. because are we not “the image of god”. The reason I put it into riddle form is that riddles are the best way to communicate conscious advise physically without the recipient totally rejecting it first. We do not take advise, we create our own. The same reason Jesus, Buddha, lao, tzu or any other men of God never wanted to say anything straight up is that people wont follow their advise straight up so they used stories, parables, and even riddles to explain the secrets of the world to people. Only those ready to understand will be able to listen to the words not spoken but wisely chosen.

Rate it

0 is the worst, 10 the best. Pick a number, add a comment if you like, then send it. Keys: 0–9 pick, Enter sends.

mean 5.00 weighted 5.00 rank 8083 views 411 View voting details →

2 votes so far. Yours would make 3.2 votes so far

3 comments

[n/a] Ranger 10-Feb-06/11:57 AM Reply
I guessed the bit about 'I Am' (eimi ei) so can I have a bonus point?
[n/a] Glasseyez › Ranger 10-Feb-06/7:45 PM Reply
Yea I guess so, its a tough riddle to figure out, did the answer disappoint you though?
[n/a] zodiac › Glasseyez 10-Feb-06/9:57 PM Reply
The question disappointed me. Can I have my pants back?