This morning (as my negro was buffing my boots) I asked him if he was ready to earn his master's degree, and he said "I thought I did last week when I purchased that on-line diploma in Slavery?"

road kill, pit bulls, the humane society, adoption, nine lives, mexican taco.

The crowd goes wild!!! ha ha ha... Oh shit, that takes the fucking cake, hahaha, jesus, dude, you are a fucking master.

P.S I only mention the soul and brain as separate because anyone who believes personality has nothing to do with the brain, and everything to do with the soul, obviously does think the soul and the brain are separate. My point is that even if you think they are separate, it is still the case that making physical changes to the brain will change a person's observable behaviour. Since all you know about someone's personality is from what you observe of their behaviour, I'd say their personality had changed. What would you say? where do u think your personality is stored? oh wait I forgot u don't have any personality hahahahaha no but seriously?

I dont blow anybody with a henna tattoo of father christmas on there cock

Yeah, well how about most people haven't been "deprived of consciousness", so your "point" is irrelevant? And how about you're making the bunko assumption that having a personality depends on being conscious?

"Anyway there is an argument to say that differences in intelligence are only as relevant as differences in hair curliness. That is to say the purpose of evolution is to create a fit with the evolutionary environment." Yes well that might be relevant if the coloureds had stayed in their own country, mightn't it? But, they made the choice to enter the fast-paced world of Civilised-society. Nobody forced them to come over here. And now look where we are: Coloured songs all over the radio like a sort of rash that you can't show the doctor because you're too embarrassed.

horus8, My comments were regarding my beliefs on a certain kind mindset of a particular type of human, this type of human comes in all ethnicities, so.... Silly human. meow, cat

dear richa, I'm below common, I'm a cat. I wish I was closer to common like you. Share some catnip. meow, cat

'If you attempt to argue that personality is a product of the soul, and not of the brain, then consider this: if you jab a pencil into someone's frontal lobes, their personality changes.' Yet more science-trite. How about someone is deprived of consciousness and only understands at the information processing level. How then does his personality change by jabbing his frontal lobe. Surely it is only his behaviour than can be said to change. Also why do you talk about soul and brain as though seperate entities?

'the fact is' makes you sound a dunce. The bell curve controversy was such fun wasn't it. They found out black peoples IQ's were a standard deviation lower than white peoples IQ's. And also that when you put a rag over a mongoloid babie face he was calm, do the same to a negroid and he has a hissy fit. Anyway there is an argument to say that differences in intelligence are only as relevant as differences in hair curliness. That is to say the purpose of evolution is to create a fit with the evolutionary environment.

I am afraid I don't have this thing you call common sense. I just have a dustbin full of a-levels. I wish I was common like you.

dear dark angel, p.i., Semantics is sort of the language equivalent of the "I'm not touching you." You know the little brother that puts his finger right in your face, but doesn't touch you, but it's not about the touching it's about your intent. It's like when you have a whole tirade on generalizing a particular group and you write 5000 words on it, but you preface it with "some"...as a sort "see I didn't mean all I meant some...I’m not generalizing…" It's a sort safety, a cowardly out, a false claim that you didn’t intend what you intended, even though you know and everyone else with common sense knows what you intended, but due to the rules of our language false people get to wiggle out of taking responsibility of their true intent, because of some grammatical rule like “some” or using the term “nigger”. meow, cat

What do people mean when they say that something "is simply semantics"?

It is a fact that white people are more likely to get skin cancer than black people. It is also a fact that black people are more likely to suffer from sickle cell anaemia than white people. It is also a fact that that white people tend to have straighter hair than black people. In fact it is obvious that there are a large number of physical characteristics associated with a person's race. The brain is a part of the body, just as the skin, or the blood, or the hair is. Why should it be any different? The fact is that there is no reason to think characteristics such as personality and intelligence aren't also influenced by race. Of course such characteristics are partly a product of an individual's environment, but there is no doubt that different brains would deal with the same environment in different ways. If you attempt to argue that personality is a product of the soul, and not of the brain, then consider this: if you jab a pencil into someone's frontal lobes, their personality changes. When it comes to racism, most people think it's wrong to generalise on the basis of race. They say things like "What you think has nothing to do with the colour of your skin". But that is the King of Generalisations. Is there any justification for it? It is perfectly conceivable that there could exist a race of people that were all evil and stupid. In conclusion, discriminating on the basis of race is only a stupid thing to do if your grounds for discrimination are unjustified. Thanks for listening.