poemranker ::Comments the most recent

CommentsComments 39441–39460 back, including replies. Only comments on poems

Don-Quixote replying on Dark Angel. Mature? or foul? by Don-Quixote 4 Oct 2003, 12:38 PM
we made love those nights and dont dare deny it.
Don-Quixote replying on Dark Angel. Mature? or foul? by Don-Quixote 4 Oct 2003, 12:37 PM
-who has repeatedly made effort to ruin his own reputation for kicks? me! some victories... I grabbed me wings twice how many times could i ignore you? plently. your sure turning out to look like someone of good maturity though, making folks look stupid and all. atleast my chosen tags fit. tsk.
Don-Quixote replying on Dark Angel. Mature? or foul? by Don-Quixote 4 Oct 2003, 12:30 PM
keep you on your toes? where did you get that little tidbit? its not existent. loose cannon? i guess. and theres many examples of me suddenly deciding to go apeshit. DW Poem was deleted in order to post something else darkie. Then I deleted the Clown poem when you decided to wail about my decision to make room, for other things and i did post a taunt right afterwards. That is not "COMMENT" deletion. And yes, im aware of "edit" but why the hell would i want comments directed at a different poem on a new posting? so you can continue to drool over it or what? you stamp all my answers to your questions as stupid, why dont you answer them youself? (constant ignoring of a repeated question...)
-=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. replying on Dark Angel. Mature? or foul? by Don-Quixote 4 Oct 2003, 12:22 PM
what about the dates?
-=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. replying on Dark Angel. Mature? or foul? by Don-Quixote 4 Oct 2003, 12:21 PM
Well it's hardly surprising that at odds of 1-1 in the "Who's going to make SupremeDreamer look stupidest" stakes, -=Dark_Angel=- comes up trumps every time.
-=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. replying on Dark Angel. Mature? or foul? by Don-Quixote 4 Oct 2003, 12:18 PM
So your reason for deleting my comments and posting this is that you're a loose cannon who plays by his own rules and likes to keep people on their toes by swinging wildly about the place making a scene? Because that's even more stupid than that -shrug- answer you gave earlier. Your "At least now theres no need to rely on false statements against my name" excuse makes absolutely no sense at all since you must admit that you deleted most of the Detective Watson debate as well as the "cuisine" debate.
then we tripped balls and met god and wasnt no burnin bush- ill tell ya that!
Don-Quixote replying on Dark Angel. Mature? or foul? by Don-Quixote 4 Oct 2003, 12:08 PM
ah, and notice the dates.
Don-Quixote replying on Aluminum Shackles - Titanium Quills by SupremeDreamer 4 Oct 2003, 12:02 PM
weak. i expected more. snarl some more. ;P
Don-Quixote replying on Dark Angel. Mature? or foul? by Don-Quixote 4 Oct 2003, 12:00 PM
oh and im not that predictable.. but i can gamble on you and rarely lose.
Don-Quixote replying on Dark Angel. Mature? or foul? by Don-Quixote 4 Oct 2003, 11:53 AM
my points were laid out in the above post. and reasons are not required for actions- but i did say something like: i like to argue. i like to swing wildly all of the sudden. i like making scenes. which you could speculate is a drug excuse. heh. dark, how thick is your skull? do these statements not reach your visual cornea or what? your quite opinionated, so enlighten me if you want, but im serious at the moment with my "reasons". but then again: ITS PARTY ANIMAL SYNDROME! "There is no point because I'm on drugs" cmon now, im much more creative than that. lmao.
What's your point? And don't say something predictable like "I don't give a shit if there's a point or not" or "There is no point because I'm on drugs". The truth of the matter is that there are reasons for all of your actions but those reasons are so mind-blowingly stupid and wrong that you'd rather pretend they don't exist.
drivel
Don-Quixote replying on Aluminum Shackles - Titanium Quills by SupremeDreamer 4 Oct 2003, 11:23 AM
The comment debate is not what i was speaking of Darkie, and you know that. ;) Its not my use of cooking terms.. perhaps you'd like to visit your recent suggestions? I like making scenes and frontpage headlines darkie, cmon now- this should have been obviouse for some time. But- you do too, in your own subtle way.. i could give a shit about cuisine vs culinary or the use of the almighty dictionary. I enjoy the act of arguing, etc. Anyway- I got other things to do, a room to clean and a house to make livable again, so toodles.
Have you committed "Real censorship"? The answer is "yes". Therefore your original remark was complete bollocks just as I said. Shall we move on? The thing I find so extraordinary about you is that whenever I question one of your actions - such as deleting my comments or randomly inserting the word "cuisine" into your work - you instantly jump on the defensive accusing me of sulking or making up convoluted reports of foulplay or spouting hot air or being stubborn or whatever, and then, after a little thought, you say that actually the word "cuisine" shouldn't have been there afterall, that you are indeed guilty of censorship and that it doesn't really look good for you, that you've had your fair share of comment deletions and now it's your turn, etc. And when I ask you why you did these things the answer is: -shrug-, or "I don't give a shit what I do", or "It's the drugs, man". So in light of such excellent and well-thought-out motives, can you really blame me for questioning your actions? The answer is "no".
SupremeDreamer replying on Nude pictures of children at work by Shardik 4 Oct 2003, 10:53 AM
I dont think you have any gooey cheap romance novel type material that would cause her to drip. perhaps S&M would please her though, she does have an obsession with inflicting pain upon a mans testie's. oh yeah, ive gone kamikaze! enjoy the show, i think it will be amusing.
and wearing ironed suits with orange W's nullify your "certainly doesn't say much for their integrity as a mature poete" some melodramatic folks would compare it to a star of david- i call it my golden lightning, also: my wings. :)
I did: most comment slayers leave no trace whatsoever.. actually, i think all that i can recall. they dont want to be known for it. Oh, and would you like it if one accused you of false crimes? or made a large amount of convoluted reports of foulplay? Did you ever feel like making lies come true? Today I work miracles, and dont ask me how it feels- i dealt with museheart and other folks in different galaxies that laid waste to my comments. this was going to happen one point or another, and now i did it. I INTENTIONALY censored a targeted comment line. And i leave the proof of it- it doesnt look good for me: but as always, i couldnt give a shit really. but i have my points to hammer. And of maturity and sound conduct? you are the last fool able to mutter anything of it. Now take your smug demeanor and shove it. heh. i like kamikaze.
Jeremi B. Handrinos replying on Nude pictures of children at work by Shardik 4 Oct 2003, 10:35 AM
Did that last week, try again. Perhaops you're just not picking the right poems of mine to read?
Wouldn't you find it even remotely off-putting if the person you were talking to suddenly stopped, mid debate, and deleted your side of the argument replacing it with a collection of smug, one-sided retorts about how blah, blah "don't leave loose ends like cuisine" blah? It certainly doesn't say much for their integrity as a mature poete capable of having a two-sided discussion about their work without losing it. Oh and one more thing: "Censorship? Real censorship wouldnt include loose comments admitting my crimes." That is complete bollocks. Think about it.