| Re: A Dear John by misheila |
Dovina 12.72.3.66 |
16-Jan-05/6:48 AM |
|
I don't like this one nearly as well as your other. This seems written out of anger without close attention to craft. It's a whiny poem. And double-spacing doesn't help, nor do the lack of a spaces after commas.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Rendered Genderless by PsydewaysTears |
Dovina 12.72.3.66 |
16-Jan-05/6:55 AM |
|
Good meter and rhyme, but the message is overstated. Lines like "I can become Anything I want to be" don't cut it, not in my world. I hear what you're saying, but please keep it real.
|
|
|
 |
| regarding some deleted poem... |
Dovina 12.72.3.66 |
16-Jan-05/7:03 AM |
|
The first verse is good. If only the rest followed. Did you have a nervous breakdown midway in the writing?
|
|
|
 |
| regarding some deleted poem... |
Blindpoetry 68.11.192.79 |
16-Jan-05/8:18 AM |
|
I thought the last stanza could have been different from the second stanza, but it's still nice. :)
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Rendered Genderless by PsydewaysTears |
Dan garcia-Black 66.159.232.165 |
16-Jan-05/10:19 AM |
|
Overstated but real as a cheeseburger and a milkshake-9-.
|
|
|
 |
| regarding some deleted poem... |
Dan garcia-Black 66.159.232.165 |
16-Jan-05/10:24 AM |
|
|
 |
| regarding some deleted poem... |
misheila 170.224.224.156 |
16-Jan-05/11:02 AM |
|
I have no comments about form or anything that the usual person would post.I just think it will be a good song.Good luck with the band and keep writing lyrics like the ones you've shared here.I gave you a 9
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Rendered Genderless by PsydewaysTears |
dancin_n_da_moonlite 205.188.116.135 |
16-Jan-05/11:26 AM |
|
nice.....i like the ham part..........and the theme is good.......though i feel you go on just a tad longer than what is most effectiv...........
-mega
|
|
|
 |
| regarding some deleted poem... |
dancin_n_da_moonlite 205.188.116.135 |
16-Jan-05/11:35 AM |
|
nice....just a tad preachy though
|
|
|
 |
| regarding some deleted poem... |
Stacy Stewart 67.51.232.76 |
16-Jan-05/1:25 PM |
|
i thought this was a really funny poem :) good job
|
|
|
 |
| Re: A Fake Hollywood by Blindpoetry |
RION12 64.136.26.226 |
16-Jan-05/5:46 PM |
|
Do you really think Hollywood is that fake?
|
|
|
 |
| Re: A Fake Hollywood by Blindpoetry |
Dovina 12.72.5.101 |
16-Jan-05/6:13 PM |
|
They named Hollywood after what they thought was holly. It was not holly, but a look-alike, the toyan bush, which also has red berries at Christmas time. Hollywood's been a fake ever since. And use spellcheck!
|
|
|
 |
| regarding some deleted poem... |
some deleted user 64.136.26.226 |
16-Jan-05/6:13 PM |
|
You are a true poet. LOL!!!!!!
|
|
|
 |
| regarding some deleted poem... |
Dovina 12.72.5.101 |
16-Jan-05/8:26 PM |
|
|
 |
| Re: Buried On Hollowed Ground by Enchantres |
Shuushin 64.222.180.230 |
16-Jan-05/8:33 PM |
|
Despite being a suicide/death poem (something too often done and done badly) this has an unusual angle in that it's a post mortem - and I like that.
What I don't like is that there are opportunities missed for some potentially nice descriptive bits: night, fog, cemetary gates. Instead you just blurt them out like a noob.
Maybe loose the whole first stanza so the reader isn't immediately disappointed right off the bat.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Only Me by heartlessempath |
Dovina 12.72.5.101 |
16-Jan-05/8:35 PM |
|
What a terrible father you must have! Quite well written and convincing. Too much punctuation. The title - why only you?
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Only Me by heartlessempath |
Shuushin 64.222.180.230 |
16-Jan-05/8:40 PM |
|
an interesting idea, this. But I thinks it's a bit overdialoged - distracting.
And the warrior angle could be clarified too, prolly.
But really, a cool thing.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Vulture by Stacy Stewart |
Dovina 12.72.5.101 |
16-Jan-05/8:41 PM |
|
|
 |
| regarding some deleted poem... |
Shuushin 64.222.180.230 |
16-Jan-05/8:42 PM |
|
Pretty funny, really. I hate clever shit I never thought of.
This might be tough to read out-loud though...
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Buried On Hollowed Ground by Enchantres |
Dovina 12.72.5.101 |
16-Jan-05/8:47 PM |
|
"Now you see," but how so? You imply consciousness after suicide death. Better to say the killer is gone and knows nothing. vote-7 only because it's well written.
|
|
|
 |