-=Dark_Angel=-, P.I.
replying on inverse square by ex0teric
13 May 2004, 1:49 PM
What about that black t-shirt you have that just says 'geek.' in white courier on the front?
thank you
This pome has nothing to do with putting a child to bed
you daft cunt.
finger a pie, pie full of fingers you have to gess what the pie is, get it!
The bottom bit is a moral sort of thing
I thought you of all people would have enjoyed
some finger pie.
what is lewd anyway?
bad ascii art is forbidden.
Bow'ls
I sink zat you vould be better usingg ze S for ze th sound at ze end off "youth"
I like gnarly.
Whilst the disjunction of (a), (b) and (c) is satisfied by nearly all comp scis, I am an exception. I'm not a geek. I don't dye my hair or wear black. I hang out, I chill, I get lashed, I do sports. And overall I'm a pretty cool guy. Once I even considered smoking a marijuana, but decided not to because I thought I might die of drugs.
To hell with caution, old boy. That knave had nothing to do with the hypatia rant; indeed his opinions on all subjects can only be described as "unbelievably appalling".
"the days go on without her...and she dreams of yesterday" makes no sense.
"she's never had true love
she's never had a life
she's never had a family
she never had money
but she never had greed
and she dreams of yesterday" makes no sense.
"every day is dark and gloomy...and she dreams of yesterday" makes no sense.
"she believes in God
and an afterlife
but she dreams of yesterday" makes no sense.
"ravaged by the loom"
Dear god -- this can only be the same loom from my poeme ''The Weaver's Curse''. Something must be done to stop this *warped* loomdividual's loompage before the situation *spindles* out of control!!!!!!1111111111
Well... you're gay, right?
"Jesus." is a fine catchphrase.
I've decided on nothing. "Oh." and "Jesus." have just made more sense to me recently than "OMG you're right ;)" or "Dear Lord, you're a gibbering lunatic", respectively. That's bound to change.
eh?... and that has to do with...?
actually, i'm not much into games... what type is warhammer?
And why have you decided that your catchphrases will be "Oh." and "Jesus."? They're rubbish.
Kindly cast your gaze upon my comment of 8:11 AM on this very page.
"Could it be, as Rush Limbaugh mentioned in passing on a recent broadcast, that the perpetrators of the alleged crime are homosexuals? If that's the case, maybe the motivation for their activities was far different than from what has been discussed in the media's wall to wall coverage of this incident. If these individuals are homosexuals, maybe they were getting stimulated by looking at naked Iraqis in sexually provocative positions.
Of course, as Limbaugh said because of the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy concerning homosexuality we'll probably never know the answer, but I think the scenario is still definitely worth considering.
After all, it would answer why the alleged activities took place and it would also provide a solution to the really bizarre question as to why pictures were taken of the humiliating and sexually suggestive poses.
Why, you ask? Many people believe that homosexuals have a much greater potential than heterosexuals to be sexual predators. In addition, a sizeable number of sexually dysfunctional individuals (aka sexual predators) take pictures of their illicit acts. It gives them an opportunity to glory in their "conquest" as they visually relive their sickening activities.
But here's an interesting scenario to ponder that Limbaugh also mentioned. If this was ever found out to be the case, what would those liberal defenders of homosexual marriage and "gay" rights do?
Would liberal Democrats have to adopt an different attitude to this situation and quit their incessant criticism of the Bush Administration and the liberation of Iraq? It's definitely something worth thinking about. After all, if the individuals involved in these alleged crimes were homosexual, or there was a homosexual element involved, who can blame them. They would just be acting out their natural biological inclinations, right? And (so the theory goes) who could fault them for that because their actions would have been a result of the way they were born, not in any way the volitional actions of a lifestyle choice."