poemranker ::Comments the most recent

CommentsComments 30661–30680 back, including replies. Only comments on poems

edpeterson on love.term by ggawrysi 7 May 2004, 8:55 AM
so.....where's the fucking?
edpeterson on Epitaph by philn 7 May 2004, 8:53 AM
bunk
Powerful spacing.
Stephen Robins on Watch Out by Nicholas Monson 7 May 2004, 8:44 AM
Watch out for Johnny the Greek, He'll bugger up the olymipics, Have a bearded wife, But not care as he prefers sodomy.
Stephen Robins on love.term by ggawrysi 7 May 2004, 8:42 AM
guff, syntax error.
Stephen Robins on The Beginning of the End by justjay 7 May 2004, 8:42 AM
A peerless, saturated jock strap of meaningless rhetoric.
zodiac replying on love.term by ggawrysi 7 May 2004, 8:38 AM
It is, but it would be better in BASIC or if it happened to produce filthy ASCII art when you ran it.
zodiac replying on California triolets by zodiac 7 May 2004, 8:20 AM
You should have seen the version where she was reading Henry Miller. Talk about morally bankrupt; I nearly exhausted my prostrate in the writing of it.
Stephen Robins replying on Epitaph by philn 7 May 2004, 7:55 AM
Of course being Welsh you are in your own seperate catergory which has no idea of how ashamed you should be of everyting they have ever done.
Shuushin on Epitaph by philn 7 May 2004, 7:53 AM
Mechanically it's not to shabbily done, I'd say. The endrhymes weave without any noticeably intrusion. The meter chugs right along, slightly bumpy toward the end there - but serves to let the reader know the station approaches. I'd try to hack out some of the conjunctions, in particular but carefully since it would affect the good flow. Philosphically, I'm willing to accept it as a character perspective, one that although I personally don't quite relate to it, I can understand. Have an Eight. A few more poetic techniques would notch it up pretty easily, given the success of the mechanics used.
Stephen Robins replying on California triolets by zodiac 7 May 2004, 7:38 AM
I asked first quim face.
-=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. on California triolets by zodiac 7 May 2004, 7:26 AM
If she really was reading Lawrence, then "assurance" is bow'ls because you only chose it to rhyme with what she happened to be reading. But if she wasn't reading Lawrence, then the whole poeme is UTTERLY MORALLY BANKRUPT.
zodiac replying on Epitaph by philn 7 May 2004, 7:08 AM
What a load of crap. And anyway, he doesn't say the middle class is ashamed, he says it's downtrodden. This is also crap.
zodiac replying on California triolets by zodiac 7 May 2004, 7:03 AM
Are you being ironical?
Nicholas Jones on Epitaph by philn 7 May 2004, 6:56 AM
Needs work, but I like it. It is the lot of the middle class to be ashamed of who they are - something not true of the poor or the rich. It is the bourgeois burden.
Nicholas Jones replying on The Influence of Anxiety by Nicholas Jones 7 May 2004, 6:54 AM
Why can't poetry reflect on ideas, not just imagery or feelings? Yours is a fundamentally anti-intellectual position. And how do you know what poetry is anyway? Like Wittgenstein said, there are things we recognise without being able to define.
Nicholas Jones replying on The Influence of Anxiety by Nicholas Jones 7 May 2004, 6:48 AM
This is not an essay. And if you think it isn't poetry, you're defining poetry in a particular manner, which is precisely what pissed me off in the first place. And I don't suppose anybody has noticed the reference to Pound's Canto XXXVIII, have they?
Nicholas Jones replying on The Influence of Anxiety by Nicholas Jones 7 May 2004, 6:46 AM
Bloomsday is the day in 1904 on which Ulysses is set. But of course it links to Harold Bloom and antithetical criticism too.
Stephen Robins on Epitaph by philn 7 May 2004, 6:13 AM
This poem is as entertaining as shopping with pants full of follow through, in a large out of town shopping centre, knowing that you have to get the bus home and someone has taken an overdose in the toilet affording you no possibility of discarding your soiled under garments. -10_
Stephen Robins replying on California triolets by zodiac 7 May 2004, 6:08 AM
Were you being ironical?