Ah. An unfermented wine with a sweet finish. Now that's a twist. See "Bach and Hollywood's bad guys" by Scott Timberg Los Angeles Times (reprinted in the Vancouver Sun Tuesday, August 26, 2003. I knew I had that article hangin' around. I hope it serves you.

This is decent. It could use a little tightening. Even though I want to read a more expressive description, this stark treatment is likely most appropriate.

Jesus is omniscient, and therefore would have to know the answer to the question "Jesus? what is wrong?". The logical inconsistency makes it hard to believe this is actually Jesus. Is it supposed to be a Jesus impersonator or imposter of some sort?

I read an article recently about the use of Bach as accompaniment to violent imagery in films. Did you see that too? I like the burning sculpure idea and would like more details of that. Might I suggest a guilotine for the hands. I have to reserve my vote until you tell me what that last line means (and what language it is). I only speak English and only just barely.

It's too bad this is on the Worst List but, if it wasn't I probably never would have had the pleasure to stumble across it.

It's vivid, I'll give you that.

Credo che dovrte rimuovere la traduzione. Coloro che non capisce che l'italiano sarà costretto per soffrire la nebbia di babelfish e coloro che capisce l'italiano riterranno lo scopo progettato. Forse è migliore senza la traduzione (ma molto elegante)

Changing comes to stays makes all the difference. Brava, signore! (Forget babelfish, I'm learning Italiano)