on A Thing I Must Do by Dovina
2 Feb 2005, 4:15 PM
This is really good. I liked the first two stanzas, particularly the second. I didn't like so much the meta-commentary of the last 7 lines. If you are serious about this one, try rewriting the last half a few times and see if you can stay in the image more and let the image make the commentary. (it's the old show not tell. First two stanzas are Very Good showing. Last two are more telling)
replying on Baghdad Election by Mona Lisa
2 Feb 2005, 8:24 AM
I think he's not American, hence his ability to use (and comprehend a use for) all those pesky shades of gray between 0 and 10.
replying on Satan's Pillar: The Wisdom of Heresy. by SupremeDreamer
2 Feb 2005, 3:37 AM
"no atheists in foxholes" Some Xtian once said this, and Xtians ever since, in their fashion of repeating things that sound to them like they should be true as though they were true without any regard to whether they actually are true, have parrotted it. What evidence can you cite that atheists stop being atheists in extreme circumstances? There is no such evidence; it doesn't happen.
It's Xtian bullshit.
It's Xtian bullshit.
There's nothing to see here. Move along. This comes from a whole different realm than you do.
...but...tell me you at least did get the "daddy wasn't planning on buying no more stuff" reference. That one HAS to be obvious to virtually anyone who grew up speaking English. Or did you grow up speaking English? I can't tell.
...but...tell me you at least did get the "daddy wasn't planning on buying no more stuff" reference. That one HAS to be obvious to virtually anyone who grew up speaking English. Or did you grow up speaking English? I can't tell.
replying on In Answer To Your Question by Dovina
1 Feb 2005, 10:32 AM
6. Eat sprouts. Trouser shouts. (http://eclectech.co.uk/parp.php)
replying on Revaluations by Beyond_Dreams
1 Feb 2005, 8:57 AM
I tried really hard to be a bum on the street several years ago, to get that whole authenticity thing going. I sold or put in storage everything I owned and hit the streets with a backpack, some photocopies of my pomes, and 40 Cdn dollars in my pocket.
Unfortunately I failed miserably, as over the next 11 months I earned around $14,000 U.S. dollars with my crappy pomes -- which, since I paid no rent during that time (I was continually offerred places to stay, or camped) and paid no taxes, was a reasonably decent amount of money with which to enjoy what was essentially a year-long vacation. Most embarrassing moment? I was on Telegraph avenue all decked out like a hippy selling photocopied pomes tackily signed with metallic gold ink (it increased how much money people "donated" for some stupid reason)and up walks a woman I went to university with...she was doing her doctorate at Berkeley. lol. She definitely seemed to buy into my bum on the streets disguise.
Unfortunately I failed miserably, as over the next 11 months I earned around $14,000 U.S. dollars with my crappy pomes -- which, since I paid no rent during that time (I was continually offerred places to stay, or camped) and paid no taxes, was a reasonably decent amount of money with which to enjoy what was essentially a year-long vacation. Most embarrassing moment? I was on Telegraph avenue all decked out like a hippy selling photocopied pomes tackily signed with metallic gold ink (it increased how much money people "donated" for some stupid reason)and up walks a woman I went to university with...she was doing her doctorate at Berkeley. lol. She definitely seemed to buy into my bum on the streets disguise.
replying on Depth of Illusion by Beyond_Dreams
1 Feb 2005, 8:33 AM
I'm DEEPLY hurt you've made no comment on my adjunct/punt/cunt limerick further down the page.
In the context of the exchange it is a part of, it's gotta be one of my all-time cleverest limericks evar. Doncha think?
In the context of the exchange it is a part of, it's gotta be one of my all-time cleverest limericks evar. Doncha think?
replying on Depth of Illusion by Beyond_Dreams
1 Feb 2005, 8:22 AM
surprised that your thought process works like this?:
"they criticized my pome > I hate them > I will look up one of their pomes and vote "0" on it. That'll show'm"
no. Not really surprised at all. In fact, it quite confirms my previous opinion of you.
"they criticized my pome > I hate them > I will look up one of their pomes and vote "0" on it. That'll show'm"
no. Not really surprised at all. In fact, it quite confirms my previous opinion of you.
replying on Depth of Illusion by Beyond_Dreams
1 Feb 2005, 6:00 AM
...you old goat.
replying on Depth of Illusion by Beyond_Dreams
1 Feb 2005, 5:59 AM
please don't change your heart too much...your comments are generally far more rewarding to read than people's pomes.
on James The Dashing Pirate by thepinkbunnyofdoom
1 Feb 2005, 5:16 AM
This is excellent.
Ending every stanza with a period hurts it. You didn't edit or work on it after writing it, did you? A little effort could tighten up the rhyming scheme. And fix "your" => you're. (this constantly slips through my fingers too, it drives me nuts)
Ending every stanza with a period hurts it. You didn't edit or work on it after writing it, did you? A little effort could tighten up the rhyming scheme. And fix "your" => you're. (this constantly slips through my fingers too, it drives me nuts)
replying on Depth of Illusion by Beyond_Dreams
1 Feb 2005, 4:43 AM
If I'd a doubt left 'bout the young poet's gender
Luzr's comment above would soon end her.
Like a dog, he's so fast
To get his nose up her ass,
That I'm a little bit frightened he'll rend her.
Luzr's comment above would soon end her.
Like a dog, he's so fast
To get his nose up her ass,
That I'm a little bit frightened he'll rend her.
replying on Depth of Illusion by Beyond_Dreams
1 Feb 2005, 2:38 AM
Interesting...you show the same lack of awareness of the distinction between the adverbial and adjectival forms of words in your comments as you do in your pomes. Missing that part of your brain, perchance?
replying on Depth of Illusion by Beyond_Dreams
1 Feb 2005, 2:35 AM
BTW: here is your clumsy attempt rewritten in actual limerick form; just so you know how it's done for future battles:
I know it may come as a shock
To one who assumes gender ad hoc
Is this retort better?
Has it gotten you wetter?
I'm a chick, so guess what -- I've no cock!
I know it may come as a shock
To one who assumes gender ad hoc
Is this retort better?
Has it gotten you wetter?
I'm a chick, so guess what -- I've no cock!
replying on Depth of Illusion by Beyond_Dreams
1 Feb 2005, 2:15 AM
Your reply's an unneeded adjunct
And you fail my aspersion to punt:
Though the pronoun was wrong
You've no need for a dong
There's protrusion enough in a cunt.
And you fail my aspersion to punt:
Though the pronoun was wrong
You've no need for a dong
There's protrusion enough in a cunt.
replying on Depth of Illusion by Beyond_Dreams
31 Jan 2005, 6:41 PM
"It's good fun getting people all defensive" --
Yes! we make 'm stew, make 'm cry, make 'm pensive
but not you -- you just sputter
and endlessly mutter
how little it means to you when rankers the tens give.
Yes! we make 'm stew, make 'm cry, make 'm pensive
but not you -- you just sputter
and endlessly mutter
how little it means to you when rankers the tens give.
replying on Depth of Illusion by Beyond_Dreams
31 Jan 2005, 6:24 PM
What kind of rejoinder is that?
Are you saying your groin's, er, less protruding than flat?
For me there's no sport
In such a lousy retort
I enjoin you, do better than that
Are you saying your groin's, er, less protruding than flat?
For me there's no sport
In such a lousy retort
I enjoin you, do better than that
on POEM FOR PREPS by Brittanyy
31 Jan 2005, 5:47 PM
Here's a girly with multiple letters,
in her name, scorifying her "betters".
But of course she's just jealous,
she'd love having some fellas --
if she'd only the bits to go get hers!
in her name, scorifying her "betters".
But of course she's just jealous,
she'd love having some fellas --
if she'd only the bits to go get hers!
replying on Depth of Illusion by Beyond_Dreams
31 Jan 2005, 5:36 PM
There once was a pome masturbatory
that tried to tell some dumb nymph's little story
but there's nothing on google
to show it's not new, go
check, you'll see it ain't stolen glory!
that tried to tell some dumb nymph's little story
but there's nothing on google
to show it's not new, go
check, you'll see it ain't stolen glory!
on Depth of Illusion by Beyond_Dreams
31 Jan 2005, 5:18 PM
Hmm, so just what IS this "depth of illusion"
painter's muse? an allusion? delusion?
..ah no, it's in BD's pants, you see
it's his little fantasy --
that he has while he rubs his protrusion.
painter's muse? an allusion? delusion?
..ah no, it's in BD's pants, you see
it's his little fantasy --
that he has while he rubs his protrusion.