very weak ending. the opening is so strong. you must follow through. or else.

oh.. well, ok, thats nice, really, how amazing.. you've wasted poetry space to shorten his long ranting.. -claps- is he paying you for this? ropey? hrmm..

Yes, yes, yes, I KNOW it's silly, pointless, melodramatic, and, for that matters, makes no sense. I was just trying to see if I could write a poem of more than twelve lines in this scheme, that's all.

An impressive twist of fate. Victims of torture often make fine abusers. This poem brought to my heart much shame and retrospection. Where should I put my tip? It's the tip of an iceberg.

but theres a 300 dollar wine bottle that delivered to me my money bag: because after nearly choking on a toenail, i sued the vineyard and recieved 2 mil. Now they require meticulous pedicures before any man, woman, child or monkey can set foot into the grape barrel. Blessed with 8.

SCIETNTOLIGISE - erm, wow.. thats a mouthful, mind telling me what it means? dictionary failed me.. you see, sometimes printed pages are not a holy saviour. Nice job. 8.5, rounded to 9.. i do want to know that word though, i gotta keep it on a post-it-note so i can remember to use it, keeping the detective busy is my number one priority!

I object to: the long space.. could have been slightly shorter.. that middle finger picture could have gotten more detail, you can call settle and ask his advice concerning creating images with notepad.. the fuckers pretty good at that. "insults and bad ascii art are not necessarily poems." jesus christ.. if thats the case, theres alot of guys that should be able to fly. that aside, what got you to make this? hrmm?

Oh yeah.. btw, it wasnt that funny because: its not something i havent seen done 1000000 ways from sunday. im not being an ass, im just saying, your not being that creative with this shit..

do you as in You argue at or on cross purposes if you argue on them what do they look like? Quadro-spazz on a life drip. I think yewl find. Is Feck girls arse going to be the title of your new poem? Do you love me?

i kinda like this one = ). well, got to go. i have a butt load of college homework to do. = )

Now you're probably going to claim that your rant was just another sarcastic post intended to thwart me. But it wasn't. hey is this a good time to tell you that i live in a cave and have a bookcollection which is actually just a large study hall i have used in planning your destruction? Its a conspiracy right darkie? Seriously, you must think i like boring myself to death, but no.. i need to enjoy some electrical source of energy.. if i were to be sarcastic, then id make things way too obviouse.. i was being cleverly subtle (yes, i can bullshit, but lets move on with life, -presses play on his tape player- if i need to explain alot of shit man, to you about why i did this and that blah blah blah, then your a hopeless case.. enjoy the radio waves.

liked it. shades of the bard's 18th sonnet.

hey there! how have you been? i have been pretty good. i wrote a few new pieces of poetry. so far The Captian is the only one that has good marks. oh well = ) at least i am enjoying myself. ttyl

"why are you so desperate to tell me which words came from the dictionary and which words you knew when you were 10?" hrmm?.. desperate? lmao. i simply had nothing better to do darkie.. really. Im the one posting long rants..aye? and whos the idiot that does the same? You. you became a monkey.. chimp see, chimp do, chimp hear growl, chimp need be king kong.. you do the work for me, i just add fuel to your retarded inferno. end of story. you shot yourself in the brains, have a nice life. you could of said all that in less, but, you see, i was on methamphetamines.. your just addicted to your gentlemans tea.. -shrug-.. im not even motivated to be passionate in my response.. being stoned and bored, im gonna go to sleep.. oh.. erm.. 4.. for being stupid enough to follow the leader. :)

this was sposed to be a pimple right?

If your so-called "dictionary-obsessed" works were deliberately splattered with long words, why are you so desperate to tell me which words came from the dictionary and which words you knew when you were 10? I knew that MOST OF THEM came from the dictionary. I never thought "melancholy" did. But it doesn't matter really. They may not ALL have come from the dictionary, but they are ALL pretentious, or combined with other semi-pretentious words to form super-pretentious phrases. You cannot deny this now, since you have just claimed you deliberately wrote them to be pretentious. "big fucking show off title" and "pure fucking crap created to see how well i could predict your pathetic ranting" as you so deftly put it. You seem to be arguing on cross purposes, on the one hand claiming they were deliberately intended to be shit, on the other claiming that you were simply using words from your own vocabulary, and that any obscurity is due to my "skimming over things". You claim that "The Mellifluous Sound of God: Musical Eden" and "Lunation: Dark Mystery Exposed" were deliberately shit, but what about "Musings: Willow Sculpture"? That piece is equally pretentious and dictionary-obsessed and, in my opinion, "pure fucking crap". If you are going to claim "Lunation" and "Musical Eden" are shit, then it's difficult to see how you couldn't say the same thing about "Willow Sculpture". But nevermind. Here's what actually happened: a) You wrote some poemes that you thought were good b) I wrote my comments c) Realising your ineptitude and the shittyness of your beloved works, you claimed they were deliberately designed to be shit as part of an evil plan to thwart me. d) But they weren't DELIBERATELY shit. e) They were ACTUALLY shit. f) It's easy to be sarcastic in retrospect. g) QED Let's not forget that if your pieces were indeed a trap, I was not the only dullard who fell for it. Both richa and <~> made similar observations concerning the verbosity of the "Musical Eden" disaster. You even replied to richa asking for further elaboration on his comments regarding the use of "phantasmogoric". No doubt you were just playing along to avoid exposing the trap. Hmm. It's hardly surprising that everyone thought they were genuine pieces because there is nothing to indicate to the contrary. The pieces in question were just like your other pieces. Usually when someone is being sarcastic, it is obvious because the irony is glaring. That way, if anyone falls for it they truly have been a bit of quadro-spazz. Take my comment on your "Musical Eden" piece, for example: "...what you lack is the uncompromisingly austere upbringing that was my privilege. I am adept in my application of such words and phrases as mellifluous, xanthous, ruminate, maleficence, opprobrium, and 'that would be an ecumenical matter', because they are not strangers to my daily vocabulary. You, on the other hand, wield the dictionary in much the same way a disabled wields an AK47 - as a strange, heavy object thrust into your hands by people who should have known better." The humour in this comment is obvious, and the sarcasm equally glaring. Having just criticised you for being pretentious, I go on to brag about the "austere upbringing that was my privilege". This is clearly Pretentiousness of the First Class! Sadly, it didn't stop you from buggering on about how you don't care if the "code of the gentlemans upbringing" endowed me "with the knowledge of nice lil words". How dare you disparage The Gentleman's Code!? Back to the matter at hand: had you written to nentwined informing him that your pieces were deliberately shit, then, when I fell for your little trap, had you referred me to nentwined who, as a trusted and impartial third party, could confirm that any sarcasm was not inserted retrospectively, I might have taken your claims a little more seriously. Since you failed in this modest task, and given the overwhelming evidence to the contrary given above, you leave me no choice but to claim victory. Again. Now you're probably going to claim that your rant was just another sarcastic post intended to thwart me. But it wasn't. You would just be doing exactly the same thing again. Your desperately aloof references to playing me like some sort of hideous guitar - "i pluck some strings, you make some noise" - are laughable. You are the one posting long rants, not me. I wouldn't post a long rant in a million squillion years. Never.

Advice? Should I boycott his hot bar?

Yes! I love when he ABC'S

Calmly beautiful.10

For your information Watson was a doctor not a detective. Once again you fail.