Re: Go by darylchew	Dovina 69.175.6.101	27-Dec-04/2:30 PM
It's down rthe hall on the left, and if occupied, there's an oleandar bush just outside. I do like the "halo beneath my feet."
Re: Oh well, shit happens by sir_heff	Lifeboatman 203.104.94.2	27-Dec-04/4:01 AM
insecure.. and I am picking up a fight.. 0
Re: Transition by Miggy	Lifeboatman 203.104.94.2	27-Dec-04/3:59 AM
too... uhm... ahh... let's just say no grace... 2
Re: a comment on Lies of Society’s Guise by PsydewaysTears	Yikes 152.163.100.138	26-Dec-04/9:36 PM
haha, I suppose you're completely correct!
Re: Math Poem 2 by Dovina	Dan garcia-Black 67.122.15.3	26-Dec-04/5:50 PM
cuter
Re: Math Poem by Dovina	sir_heff 65.13.72.62	26-Dec-04/2:41 PM
Two and nothing more is the same as one and one. are you expecting a threesome? -10- 'caues math kicks ass
Re: A Wanderlust To The New by fevriere	Bhaskaryya 61.0.144.84	26-Dec-04/9:01 AM
Beautiful!!!
Re: a comment on A Wanderlust To The New by fevriere	fevriere 62.254.128.4	26-Dec-04/7:43 AM
I've edited it, according to your crit. Thanks! If you'd like to reread it, it's above.
Re: a comment on Disable by blacksoul	-=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. 81.153.196.50	26-Dec-04/7:26 AM
"Indeed they are not overwhelmingly so." Yes they are. "And what if he did?" Then he's a plagiarist. Obviously. "And what if he didn't?" Then he independently came up with the same idea. He has not taken someone else's idea and passed it off as his own. "You simply listen to yourself and blah blah blah" Humbug.
Re: a comment on "oh" by fevriere	fevriere 62.254.128.4	26-Dec-04/7:26 AM
I'm not sure. "under" seemed to be a word of hiding the actual physical expression of emotion, the tear itself.. The tear appears to be represented by the round letter of 'o'. This is very helpful to me, going through the poem at word level. I am usually too lazy to give a poem integrity but I will never write well until I consider what words I mean to use in every every instance and why. So thankyou. :)
Re: a comment on I have Learned to Let Go by Joe-joe	zodiac 212.118.14.17	26-Dec-04/5:00 AM
No. I'm upset because I don't much like you. Two days back and you're already bumming on about... I don't know what exactly. -:-(-
Re: a comment on I have Learned to Let Go by Joe-joe	zodiac 212.118.14.17	26-Dec-04/4:58 AM
If you didn't think it was a contradiction, there'd be no point in your posting the comment. I'm willing to grant there was no point. Of course they're different. But if you believe 1) you necessarily believe 2). That's the part you didn't get. Now you'll say you do. Wrong, you still don't.
Re: a comment on Scapegoat by Dovina	zodiac 212.118.14.17	26-Dec-04/4:55 AM
LOL
Re: a comment on Disable by blacksoul	zodiac 212.118.14.17	26-Dec-04/4:53 AM
If you hadn't spent all of Freshman Comps doing whatever it was you were doing with yourself at the time, you'd know plagiarism doesn't mean what you think it does. This is plagiarism. Incidentally, that's my word, from my field. You will argue, but you might as well be walking into some laboratory, unequivocally trumping 'You're all wrong, this isn't rocket-fuel' and then drinking the whole beakerful. Oh, no, wait. You CAN disagree because we're talking about words, and words are everyone's friends. Bum.
Re: a comment on Math Poem by Dovina	zodiac 212.118.14.17	26-Dec-04/4:47 AM
If you can cram into your head the idea that "magical" only roughly means "not abiding by logic or satisfactorily explainable by logical analysis", you'll be fine. But you can't and won't. Your bigger problem is that you apparently think (and have indeed railed on about many a time) that we only examine, criticise or otherwise deal with poemranker poems according to their logical merits. Don't say, I haven't said this! No, of course you haven't said exactly that. You said it much more bumblingly and malapropismed. The ideas that usually make it into poems ARE hard to critique, especially since they're usually some variation on "God is Love", "Love is both pleasurable and painful", or, and rarely, "Negroes are people too, though obviously a lesser sort." Since it's pretty obvious that a poem is crap without some kind of logic, it IS easy to critique the logic of a poem you don't like and safely conclude that it's crap. And most poems I don't like ARE illogical. Your other problem is thinking "logical" means something like 'involving numbers or the word Boolean' (cf. Shuushin's respectably logical poem, posted here.) Bow'ls. And another shameful stain on your much-besmirched record.
Re: a comment on Math Poem by Dovina	zodiac 212.118.14.17	26-Dec-04/4:25 AM
Again you have said someone's saying opposites and attempting to unite them and then trumped loudly and unapologetically into the resulting vacuum. And never mind that the bulk of your "disses" depend on what you imagine are the negative connotations of the words "seems", "apparent" and "attempted", which really, in the long run, mean nothing as insults except to bums like you. Where you get the idea that I've "said opposites" is beyond me. Do you mean that the statements "You are a bum" and "You have a bum idea about poetry" are opposites? Consider that in the first statement bum means something like "a hobo or transient" and in the second means something like the sense of "a bum leg" or "a bum pitching arm". Now even you must see their only loosely related. As concerns your second question, a truckdriver like INTRANSIT would (and does) write poetry at best like a bad or unpracticed poet, and at best like a decent poet. That he writes poems about truckdriving is pretty irrelevant. He writes them like a poet talks about truckdriving, not like a truckdriver talks about truckdriving. Do you see the distinction? I bet not. Despite that the rest of your comment agrees, forgets that it contradicts your earlier position, and then trumps loudly. I've been bored.
Re: a comment on "oh" by fevriere	zodiac 212.118.14.17	26-Dec-04/4:15 AM
The last of you to get run off of poemranker was run off for amock Booleanism. If I were you, I'd stop using some word I heard somewhere and thought it was cool (and who doesn't think 'Boolean' sounds cool?) until I figured out what it's all about. And it seems pretty unlikely you'll be able to manage that any time before the 28th century. Anyway, you've been warned.
Re: a comment on Lies of Society’s Guise by PsydewaysTears	PsydewaysTears 69.240.74.35	25-Dec-04/11:15 PM
Ah yes... but it's that whole ever-present concept of "people" that the speaker of this poem wants so desperately to get away from. Validation from the masses is the last thing this poem needs. :D
Re: Lies of Society’s Guise by PsydewaysTears	Yikes 64.12.116.67	25-Dec-04/10:51 PM
Well, Lies of Society's Guies has a better rhythmic quality (this is comming from a musician). A lot catchier still in my eyes. As a whole, if people would take the time to read this piece, I believe they'd be awed.
Re: a comment on there's no way out by oneglove	oneglove 67.96.13.41	25-Dec-04/10:48 PM
well, more kind to me. and only a 5 this time? where did i go so wrong?