Along with apparently a toilet brush with no teeth.

It is not. The best part was "more intimate than theirs."

Please carry on. You’re right in character now.

Ummm... I've really had a great laugh about all of this, but I was wondering if you might take it down if I cryed uncle? Because, leaving this link in my other areas like on my blog and especially on my cdbaby page as a review was particularly embarrasing, and not very gentleman like conduct, so could you please desist in defaming my character it would mean a great deal to myself and my family, thank you.

This isn't about me, Dovina. It's about your bulging failure to use and interpret words correctly. For example, you don't realise that "the team were desperate" is the preferred form in British English, which is the Batman's English. Your misunderstandings of regional variations in language use alone form a vast, whooshing catalogue of "hobo guss". When taken together with your shocking physical, personal, social, and ethical deformities, it's a wonder you can even struggle into your full-body wellington in the morning, let alone summon up the energy to make mistake after terrifying mistake on the internet. Case in point: "colossal" is spelled "colossal."

I almost didn't, then thought I might offend your senibilities with the antiquated Superman or Batman. I try to be polite that way, even while considering all of them on a par. I find nothing collossal about it.

I stand by my superlatives, dear. If you think differences between superheroes are so trivial, why did you include "or Spiderman"? THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT

I’m sure you mean the team was desperate, not “were desperate.” And another thing: Saying someone is colossally wrong and a fool over trivial differences among the superheroes is a trait of -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. that is overused. The team should consider revising such abuse of superlatives because it discredits the times when he says someone is colossally wrong, and the person really is. I remain available for consultation on matters such as this, and more so when spoken to with at least minimal decency. :)

"Does anyone not suspect he is the embodiment of thwarted lives seeking betterment through a Superman or Spiderman." lol 'embodiement of thwarted lives'. Good grief you couldn't be more wrong. 'Through a Superman or Spiderman'? That's hilarious. It's hilarious because you included the 'or Spiderman', as if Spiderman some how has particular qualities, distinct from those of Superman, or any other generic superhero, that may or may not be more suited to the -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. persona. Well your colossally wrong big time. It's patently obvious to anyone who 'gets' -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I., that he is an attempt at seeking betterment through a Batman. Something that is completely different from seeking betterment through a Superman, or even a Spiderman. You fool. "The project might even attract me if the character were not so obnoxious." How gallant of you to decline our offer. In fact the -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. team were so desperate for your input, that one of my colleagues burst into tears when he heard you weren't interested in the project. We'll try and carry on without you, but I fear it will be an uphill struggle. :(

Still a good read. I don't know what you've changed or what a lot of of it means, but it's an Iliad feeling to saunter through it.

ahh i see

How can something be called truly poetic? Is that different trom or better than poetic? This poem has a good theme with a lot of chunky language.

Very true. It's probably the same poem.