Brittanyy
on I Shall Fight by Torok
6 Jul 2004, 10:37 AM
Uh....Okayy....
As weird as this may seem I think this poem, if edited properly could have some potential. I don't know why people have to be so vicious in their comments though I mean hey, at least you gave it your best shot huh? Be constructive people!!
This entire argument could have been avoided if Quarton had used the word "model" instead of "reality". However, he was forced to use the word "reality" because popular science books always use the word "reality" because "changing realities" sound much more exciting than "changing models". Thanks.
The basic oneness of the universe is one of the most important
revelations of modern physics, you twerp. Quantum theory has
abolished the notion of fundamentally separated objects and
who we formerly perceived to be an observer,(you and me) are
instead, participators. There exists an essential unity of
all things and events and humans are an integral part of this
unity. Take the time to read about quantum mechanics and then
we could discuss it. It is painfully apparent that neither of
you has a clue regarding its meaning. But that is fine as long
as you have each other to bolster your perceived knowledge and
superior intellects. You deserve each other.
Great work! I like the way you've cleverly managed to turn an ordinary piece of prose into a poeme simply by adding linebreaks all over the place!
If zodiac "sounds like a little kid without the knowledge to debate beyond juvenile name calling", you sound like a duncely teenager desperately trying to talk like a grown-up.
Of course -=Dark_Angel=- believes in quantum physics. The only person who doesn't is the straw dunce you've been madly attacking. But -=Dark_Angel=- doesn't believe that saying the word "quantum" gives one license to invent all sort of mystic pseudo-scientific guff-malarky and trump it about the place without cleaning up afterwards.
Have you actually studied quantum mechanics academically? Or have you just read a few popular science books which glossed over the details and filled your head with a load of vaguely-defined buncombe? Tell the truth now.
You are really incredible. Dark Angel's "perfectly specific
assertion" that you refer to says nothing specific and sounds
like the words of a little kid without the knowledge to debate
beyond juvenile name calling.
As to your assertion that I have been, "soundly flogged by
specifics", in your dreams, turkey. You and Dark Angel are
both simpletons and should take turns congratulating each other
on your self-perceived, mutual profundity.
One hundred years ago, science universally believed in a
Cartesian, mechanistic reality which has now been replaced by
the dynamic reality of quantum mechanics. What we have is
a change in reality based upon a new way of viewing the world
we live in. And as time passes, this reality may be once again
proven to be bogus. So, reality or our perception of it does
indeed change. Is that so tough to comprehend, you lame brain.
Yes, I agree on some factual realities and some specious ones.
This is not uncommon now nor has it been throughout human
history. Going back only one hundred years, the universe was
generally viewed from a universal Cartesian reality that
has now been proven wrong by quantum mechanics. So now, we
have a different reality that is believed to be fixed and true.
Yet, will it stand the test of time or will it also prove to be
wrong.
And so the beat goes on.....
"You give no specifics" is the buncombe dodge of an inveterate guffer. Look back at the comments on this page. Now, have you at any point said anything more specific than "What is seen as reality varies but you are right in that reality is a constant" - which, incidentally, is not what ANY OF US have been talking about here, yourself included? Have you given any reason or proof for ANY OF YOUR ASSERTIONS AT ALL???!?! Yet, you've been soundly flogged by specifics all over your page, not the least of which is the perfectly specific assertion that -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. likes to "help people who are colossal boobs by telling them they're colossal boobs," - for which NO FURTHER JUSTIFICATION IS NEEDED.
PS-'Upon reading your comment, X, I could only shake my head in disbelief and utterly fail to respond to your points,' is the bullshit floundering of a desperate sinking guff.
PPS-You misspelled apropos.
Your convoluted logic is quite incredible. You call me a
"colossal boob" and claim you are doing so for my own good,
motivated by kindness. Yet, you give no specifics or reason
beyond a simplistic claim that you "like to help people who
are colossal boobs by telling them they're colossal boobs."
This ludicrous statement needs no opinion from me. It stands
without rebuttal as coming from a simpleton who should reflect
on the absolute stupidity of such discourse.
Regarding an "intuitive bad mouthing" compared to a "factual bad
mouthing", I can only shake my head in disbelief.
There is an apropo suggestion I have for you that was written by
Mark Twain:
"It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to
speak and remove all doubt"
So please get off my ass as I don't really enjoy these type
of vindictive and shallow arguments which do no one any good.
yeah i meant to put it as a lyric, it was just a careless mistake.
problems that dwell in our world???
i do think "faltered ego" could be better stated. more clear.
"her foot servants too"
what is with all the low votes here?
i think confined to an air of vanity is quite a good line.
and we sang to her
i think this poem is excellent
TRYING to succeed is just too typical...is what i think he is trying to say....but that is not any more accurate. second verse is great.
i would give you a 10, but since you already have a 3....i think shooting for the worst list is a better option. blob on.