replying on Taffy by knickytoy
25 Sep 2002, 6:52 AM
and we put a fairly decent dent in that chardonnay, even without katpez's help.
knicky-t's one smart cookie. she's a radcliffe girl. i went to art school, 'nuff said. but i still beat her at scrabble last night. (we take turns winning, i guess) listen to me, answering for her. we are both gardeners; we are creatures of rivalling beauty; and, i, at least, could give a crap about caps. it's the alliteration and the assonance that i'm on about, p&k. (sorry if i answered for you, knicky-t)
taffy is a candy traditionally made with sugar and salt water. boil it down let it cool, pull and stretch it--wrap it in wax paper, and sell it to tourists. see: http://www.mtnlaurel.com/Recipes/taffy.h
on Morning conflict by INTRANSIT
24 Sep 2002, 8:35 AM
ah, but you are triumphant! you have the hart's blood! you have slain thy enemy, and eaten his still-beating (or, still brewing, as the case may be) heart! BRAVO!
replying on The flower game by shwenatjadeflower
24 Sep 2002, 8:18 AM
thought so.
replying on Unveiled by aperfecttool77
24 Sep 2002, 8:18 AM
i'm going to go with art/poem as an expression of an idea of a particular reality, from a particular point of view.
replying on The flower game by shwenatjadeflower
24 Sep 2002, 8:15 AM
who's yer daddy???
replying on The flower game by shwenatjadeflower
24 Sep 2002, 8:09 AM
toenails, too christof
replying on The flower game by shwenatjadeflower
24 Sep 2002, 8:08 AM
does that wadded tissue bear any sort of scented resemblance to a certain PILLOW?????
replying on The flower game by shwenatjadeflower
24 Sep 2002, 7:56 AM
she cheated on you with me, and i'm not even gay!!! (I think it was just because i'm a gardener, and the dirt under my nails REALLY turned her on)
replying on Unveiled by aperfecttool77
24 Sep 2002, 7:41 AM
no. but sometimes it takes a hell of a long time for people to accept a different way of thinking. vangogh painted what he physically saw. his medication warped his vision. people were freaked because they didn't see things like that. they wanted...well, macdonalds. everything the same, all the time, even if it does taste like shit. same thing with seaurat and monet, manet, etc. they broke images down into impressions of color. people couldn't deal with the scientififc concept of the optical mix. stand back far enough, and damn those paintings look tight. but they're swishy-swahy, or points of color. new stuff is hard to swallow. what were talking about, any way? bees dying, right?
replying on yellow afterthoughts by royalflesh
23 Sep 2002, 9:55 PM
you may have some of mine, sirrah.
replying on A Separation by *Lyrisick*
23 Sep 2002, 8:43 PM
nope. it confuses rather than pleases, guy
replying on Spanish fLie by flatliner
23 Sep 2002, 8:41 PM
i usually use google translate. just lazy this time, i guess. thanks for the link. google lacks some langs i often want--like latin. who says it's a dead language? how can it be? it's not, dammit! and now back to your regularly scheduled poemming.
replying on Spanish fLie by flatliner
23 Sep 2002, 8:33 PM
thank yew nentwined. you have more than me, even if is scarfed up offa some smelly ichthiosite. blech. who baited this hook, anyway?