| Re: a comment on Andrew part II by Spindle |
horus8 24.130.62.63 |
22-Dec-04/11:02 PM |
|
ha ha ha... that gave me a cackle, LEMONAIDS.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: I have Learned to Let Go by Joe-joe |
horus8 24.130.62.63 |
22-Dec-04/11:00 PM |
|
The raping of a wet hand towel.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Drowned in Free Verse by auscot |
horus8 24.130.62.63 |
22-Dec-04/10:59 PM |
|
|
 |
| Re: 10.25.04 by oneglove |
horus8 24.130.62.63 |
22-Dec-04/10:57 PM |
|
You must be a gothic marauder.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Andrew part II by Spindle |
zodiac 212.118.11.30 |
22-Dec-04/10:28 PM |
|
You should write a happy poem about having AIDS.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: I have Learned to Let Go by Joe-joe |
zodiac 212.118.11.30 |
22-Dec-04/10:26 PM |
|
Go back to wherever you were.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on I have Learned to Let Go by Joe-joe |
zodiac 212.118.11.30 |
22-Dec-04/10:24 PM |
|
Only you think that's a contradiction.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Twin Forks by auscot |
zodiac 212.118.11.30 |
22-Dec-04/10:21 PM |
|
LOLTTM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oh, my!
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Fugitively Speaking by Dovina |
zodiac 212.118.11.30 |
22-Dec-04/10:19 PM |
|
This poem says nothing except that your as bad at psychology as most other things you've tried to write about here. And that despite your too often repeated (and probably new) aversion to God, your terribly, shamefully moral in the most conventional sense.
And what part of 'jape' are you not understanding?
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Religious Slaughter by Beyond_Dreams |
zodiac 212.118.11.30 |
22-Dec-04/10:08 PM |
|
I thought I was disagreeing with "if we are successful in Iraq it will be as much a victory for secularism as anything else". Now I'm not so sure :-(
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Math Poem by Dovina |
zodiac 212.118.11.30 |
22-Dec-04/10:07 PM |
|
This is where you get yourself in trouble every time. I haven't said anything about you being a bum "and therefore having a bum idea of poetry." For one thing, being a bum doesn't mean you necessarily have a bum idea about poetry. Consider, for example: http://www.angelfire.com/folk/famoustramp/poems.html
To rephrase. You are a bum. You have a bum idea about poetry.
To wit, you clearly think poetry, that magical ephemeral gobble that it is, has something to do with almost anything except the skill and technique needed to write good poetry. Consider my original questions for the comment above:
Q: How would a painter, as a poet, write poetry?
A: Why the fuck wouldn't he write it like a poet?!?! You're essentially saying: Frank is a painter. Frank is a poet. Frank writes poetry like a painter, not like a poet. You say this because you think poetry takes little work except for tapping into the meatwell of your tender pre-menopausal heart. Anyone can do it.
Or, you're bound to argue, so -
Q: How would Van Gogh, as a painter, make a chair?
A: Probably all bad, crooked and perspectiveless. You'd think that's cool, I'm sure. Until you tried to sit in it and fell on your detaching uterus. Or bum.
In all honesty, Merry Christmas.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Andrew part II by Spindle |
Dovina 17.255.240.138 |
22-Dec-04/5:23 PM |
|
restrain->restraint
"love's soothing touch AND scalding strike" good line.
It did seem like killing myself the first time he did that. You're right, it's about virginity.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Disable by -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. |
Dovina 17.255.240.138 |
22-Dec-04/5:14 PM |
|
Retibution is only exceeded in sweetness by ridicule.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Twin Forks by auscot |
auscot 138.130.92.116 |
22-Dec-04/4:57 PM |
|
Made my day, but a literary masterpiece?
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Twin Forks by auscot |
auscot 138.130.92.116 |
22-Dec-04/4:55 PM |
|
Thanks, can't get better than 10.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Twin Forks by auscot |
auscot 138.130.92.116 |
22-Dec-04/4:54 PM |
|
Thanks brother, I lived in Africa for a few years amongst beautiful people.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Twin Forks by auscot |
auscot 138.130.92.116 |
22-Dec-04/4:50 PM |
|
Thanks Dovina, a great score. Punctuation has always been my weakness, I tend to grap a pinch, scatter it and hope it lands in the right place. Re 'No longer..., it seemed ok at the time. Thanks for the crit.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Andrew part II by Spindle |
Spindle 69.240.144.130 |
22-Dec-04/2:45 PM |
|
Not to yell at you or anything, but I would just ike to comment on the fact that whenever someone writes a sad poem people patronize them, saying that at least they don't have cancer or AIDS or something, and whenever someone writes a happy poem they are called naive and fake. How can you win like that?
Oh, and just so you know, this peom wasn't just about losing my virginity. I hope that's not how it came across to everyone.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Cool car!! by DR Limerick |
DR Limerick 213.48.74.38 |
22-Dec-04/2:07 PM |
|
Just like you. hay soul man!!
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Joanna by DR Limerick |
DR Limerick 213.48.74.38 |
22-Dec-04/2:03 PM |
|
Yar diz ist just vot ims lookig for vell doning.
good limerick 10/10
|
|
|
 |