darylchew
on True Friendship; No boundaries with You and Me by meghan
5 Sep 2004, 6:57 AM
is bestest even a word. spelling mistakes.
molest?
some nice comparisons
-10-
"A mere afterthought for those who would pose war,"
You fucking retard. I've never read anything this stupid, seriously. Oh, and by the way, your use of ellipses is soooooo cool AND literate! Maybe you do it to seem like a "normal", "chatty", and "generally well-liked guy" instead of "one of the educated elite". Or maybe it's just because you're the dimmest guy ever! Enjoy your life!
P.S.-If I were at all inclined to make a conversation out of this, I'd say the primary "forces" "molding" "man's character" are his tendencies to blunder around into things alot and not learn very much from what he's blundered into. This probably leads him to do as many "good" or "selfless" things as "evil" or "selfish" things, since neither is necessarily harder or more distasteful than the other, and since both of those categories are the dampest of turds anyway. So it's not like you're going to get with a lot of nice, non-desperate chicks talking about them! Maybe you should stop!
Affectionately,
zodiac
zodiac
replying on Swimming in Space & Fishing for the Luridness Monster by SupremeDreamer
5 Sep 2004, 2:58 AM
The above comment is true only inasmuch as Eliot's "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock" is a steaming turd-burrito discharged by a fat bowel-challenged lardsack of self-glorifying guff and gobbled with relish by gabbling wolf-reared infants whose only salvation is their insistence that it is, in fact, fois gras. The most obvious retort here is that I don't know shit about "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock." I do, and you can't prove otherwise.
This is quite possibly the saddest, and most precise poem I've ever read. I am so sorry.
good use of words, however, i respect soldiers more than you give them credit for
no vote
And where would we be without them? A poignant reminder.
VIOLETSUEDE ALERT. VIOLETSUEDE ALERT. VIOLET SUEDE ALERT.
Chris you are a cow. I have never managed a nice comment from paki but when you complemented one of mine I was so proud. After you praised this I am no longer proud.
Falls down a bit when the child has a particularly accident prone parent which it has to repeatedly risk its life to save its parent. And in evolutionary terms parents are less useful than their offspring (until they themselves become parents). Also complicated in that a parent can protect a number of its offspring at once. Therefore the effectiveness of such altruism would depend on the number of offspring. Anyway in conclusion doug is a dunce.
I would also advise anyone suggesting demarcating areas of human behaviour (Doug) to look at how the brain functions. Try hitting someone with a hammer in order only to disrupt their speech (clue:- you can't). Someone told me brain function was relevant to psychology, maybe not in america.
Thank you, Dark Angel...... You are so sweet.
Love,
Doug
Thank you dark Angel......
Love, Doug
PLEASE NOTE ABOVE.
Dear Dark Angel:
I agree with you as you do have a very good point. However, as you can see, I did make provision for your well-made point in that man, having been "melded into society/socialized/brain-washed" is, I feel, moved, by the evolutionary force, to cooperate with those within "his own family" (his national group) in order to defend himself/his group of fellows by killing the enemy.......... in order to survive.
Love,
Doug
Very amusing.
Quite nice.
I'd leave out "heavenly" on line 3, and "lost" in line 5.
Line 6: "As the breeze stirs . . .
Omit "The totality of"
A beautiful scene.
A good thought in need of control. Get a grip on that yarn, tighten it up.