I only said that in lifeless parody of a comment I made a few days ago, when I pointed out that I have become a lifeless parody of myself. It seems your ironic observation was not as ironic as you thought. How ironic. Obviously, I didn't fail to read the poeme. Obviously, you know I didn't fail to read the poeme. That is a silly sort of reply.

This coming from the king of mindless self parody. Obviously, you failed to read the poem. So, fuck you, turkey.

Thats because: a) I spell checked it. b) The piece of shit has been deleted

Yeah, you tried to pull that one last night. I'm not falling for it again, bitch. And it was less of a roar than a meow...oh no, I'm thinking of someone else.

Oh, yes...ahhhhhh

I go back to your earlier statement that logic does not change or become inadequate. In fact, it does both when dealing with the quantum world and that is all I am saying. Understand that I am talking about classical logic and not quantum logic. Bell's theorem and quantum logic have much in common. The most exciting in my opinion is together, they show a reality where all parts of the universe are connected in a very real and immediate way. Such concepts are where my interests lie and I am tired of arguing with you. Light has a dual nature, (particle and wave) and it is beyond the capabilities of ordinary logic to understand. (remember the law of contradiction?) So enough is enough. Have a nice day, dipshit:)

Whoever gave the award: I'm a man, bitch! Suck my cock and hear me roar!