poemranker ::20 most recent comments by Limness and replies

Comments byLimness, the 20 most recent, including replies. Only comments on poems

on joyriding by Bill Z Bub 1 Jan 2003, 10:59 PM
this has good ideas, but seems very unfinished
on If I Could by little_angel_maria 1 Jan 2003, 10:36 PM
hey maria, nice to see you writing and rhyming. :]
on ... by logun2002ya 1 Jan 2003, 10:34 PM
eye think you're wright
on Second Attempt at Haiku by loneshadow29 1 Jan 2003, 10:33 PM
huh?
replying on Danse by Limness 12 Dec 2002, 11:57 AM
last line changed. unity hit it for why i started it that way.
replying on Danse by Limness 12 Dec 2002, 11:56 AM
sorry rebecca. i changed it, then changed it back. i like 'twirl'. can't help myself.
replying on Danse by Limness 11 Dec 2002, 7:50 PM
what would be better? 'whirl'? 'are caught in its sway'?
i am open to suggestion; this was a fast write, and will change, no doubt. the first line is a decade old; the rest is changed. so, speak...
on TRIBUTE TO A FRIEND by Nicholas Monson 5 Dec 2002, 7:21 AM
entertaining. but i think you could do it better--it's choppy in places, and i have seen that you possess command enough to mend this.
on HATTIE by Nicholas Monson 5 Dec 2002, 7:19 AM
great metaphors. ironically, i feel the affection and cautious lack of attractions. well-crafted, sir.
replying on Never Alone at Night by Limness 5 Dec 2002, 7:17 AM
i think that 'quietus' has context clues enough to justify its use, and the assonance is the reason i chose it. it's a whispery word, which is where my grief walks now. and, it was an ending, a passing, because although he is still very alive for me, there is no 'us'; that entity is a dead hope.

i will have a look at yours. thanks.
replying on Never Alone at Night by Limness 3 Dec 2002, 1:17 PM
thank you for your comments. in the line about quietus, my meaning is, before what was between us died, before he withdrew from me. i am not sure how to resolve the problem of who is being addressed; many of the pieces i write are written to him, for him. they are more intimate that way. i make the reader assume the role of voyeur. i hope it works.
on broken bottles by richa 30 Nov 2002, 4:56 PM
gracious, this is gorgeous.
replying on stung by Limness 30 Nov 2002, 4:55 PM
thank you. would you like to know the source?
on Happy hour by flatliner 18 Nov 2002, 6:10 PM
amen.

(but it's altar)
replying on "Why would I need to get in touch with you?" by Limness 18 Nov 2002, 5:12 PM
thanks. my reasoning? i like the two "nothing"s because it's more self-effacing that way--as my "i" is lowercase, and his is uppercase. and i'm keeping "didn't" instead of "did not" because his attitude towards me was so flip, so casual.
replying on "Why would I need to get in touch with you?" by Limness 18 Nov 2002, 1:57 PM
better? it's so fucking close to home i can't see it, so i appreciate the help.
replying on "Why would I need to get in touch with you?" by Limness 18 Nov 2002, 6:09 AM
i asked someone for their number; see title for their response. at least you can proudly say you earned a slam.

write what you see. forget about what others will think. so sayeth z.
replying on without music by Limness 13 Nov 2002, 7:25 AM
can you help with suggestions, please?
on Kindling by <~> 11 Nov 2002, 6:41 PM
what is up with the zeros? are you dead inside?
on The Funnyman by Christof 1 Nov 2002, 8:05 AM
everyone has their own tropical spring these days, now don't they? how would we get on without them?