on The rendition (once bad movie night) by ~incarnate~
4 Nov 2002, 7:03 AM
who stood in effigy for him? why not do more with this? it's amusing...
replying on Her Name Is Stella by Tascobar
30 Oct 2002, 11:29 AM
stay out of my pub, damn you!!!
replying on In the Quiet of the Night a Tree Gently Shakes by Nicholas Jones
30 Oct 2002, 7:59 AM
oops--typo. fingers not awake yet. no, i love it as it is.
on In the Quiet of the Night a Tree Gently Shakes by Nicholas Jones
30 Oct 2002, 7:50 AM
'sleeps slips far'--tasty!
on Her Name Is Stella by Tascobar
30 Oct 2002, 7:42 AM
why must she cost so damn much?
replying on Morning Glory by waltfreakinwhitman
30 Oct 2002, 7:38 AM
i gave it a low vote, but only so it could rise to the top of the wurst list. i think it's hysterical.
on Jackanapes and smoke buttons by Bachus
30 Oct 2002, 7:05 AM
you were cleary not a good fit, jack. this is a painful read; you are getting closer. put down that kale gun, wouldja? the thing makes me nervous. here, have a canape, i mean, 10.
on i'm the jesse james of the seven-eleven chain by Bachus
30 Oct 2002, 7:02 AM
yee-haw.
on Another Tragic Love Poem by greym0on
30 Oct 2002, 6:53 AM
whatever did you so foolishly do? well, it does not matter. you have ripped a new tear in my heavily-scarred heart. curse you.
replying on boy girl by little_angel_maria
29 Oct 2002, 1:42 PM
i think he fired him this time for bbq-ing HIS nuts (and eating them in the pantry)
replying on In the Valley of Two-Dollar Pints of Red Hook IPA by <~>
29 Oct 2002, 1:01 PM
slumming, darling. that's what it's all about in the run down mill towns of the housatinic river valley.
because that's how faith operates. no, strike that, make it 'that's how organized religion operates.' there. that's the frighteneing part. trying to surmount all that has power, so that it can control the faithful.
strive to write pieces that make people uncomfortable. "like" is immaterial. make them think instead. in mine, people like them because i seduce with sooth. but there are barbs aplenty in this thick skin, and if you touch, if you stray, you will find them.
showing the ugly side at the same time as the pretty side is tricky stuff, and you did it well. so, why apologize?
strive to write pieces that make people uncomfortable. "like" is immaterial. make them think instead. in mine, people like them because i seduce with sooth. but there are barbs aplenty in this thick skin, and if you touch, if you stray, you will find them.
showing the ugly side at the same time as the pretty side is tricky stuff, and you did it well. so, why apologize?
replying on Hve you ever..... v2 by INTRANSIT
29 Oct 2002, 12:42 PM
well, i see the small trials angle of it, but you are complaining about them. now, as for the g-string, that's a nice thought, but i mostly 'go commando'.
on Hve you ever..... v2 by INTRANSIT
29 Oct 2002, 12:25 PM
the problem with this one is that it tells. i have no issue with a good bitch session now and again, and you've certainly earned one, but this one comes across as a litany of complaints about soul-shattering vignettes that are written off as unimportant. it spells everything out. it says, 'do i *have* to' or 'when are we going to *be* there'? it's whiny when you want it to be lonely. that's my take.
replying on Hve you ever..... v2 by INTRANSIT
29 Oct 2002, 12:21 PM
you can surf fo' free at the public library... much less than kinko's at .16/min...