Re: a comment on Hunger 2 by Dovina	zodiac 212.118.14.17	9-Mar-05/5:03 AM
Yes, and the best part is that if you actually enter it in AUTOCAD, it creates the perfect illusion of enormous saggy milkbags whapping you in the face.
Re: eat what you want. by burgerking33	Dan garcia-Black 66.159.232.11	9-Mar-05/5:02 AM
Nice, tight, little rant. Good diet, too. If you shove all that stuff up your... It never gets into your blood stream to clog your arteries.
Re: a comment on wishes by the_poetess	zodiac 212.118.14.17	9-Mar-05/4:57 AM
After the revolution, we'll build specially programmed robots to take you out of the box without any effort on your part.
Re: a comment on Snow Sucks by JoyLuck	zodiac 212.118.14.17	9-Mar-05/4:55 AM
Why don't you just take it further and say a painting with paints is a poem? Then "poem" won't really mean anything more than "beautiful" and people can stop belabouring it and get on with their lives. Or maybe you just heard somebody say a sunset or woman's body was a poem once and believed it.
Re: a comment on Poet, Earth mover by INTRANSIT	zodiac 212.118.14.17	9-Mar-05/4:48 AM
No it's not, you dope. And have you ever noticed how adverbs are made from adjectives, not from nouns? Maybe he meant portly?
Re: a comment on Fastso by Dovina	zodiac 212.118.14.17	9-Mar-05/4:44 AM
Dear Christ...
Re: a comment on Severed by shadowaura	zodiac 212.118.14.17	9-Mar-05/4:27 AM
How many poemranker users are you?
Re: a comment on Fastso by Dovina	zodiac 212.118.14.17	9-Mar-05/4:22 AM
Q1: Oh, I see that now. Q2: I did. You said it wasn't. Q3: Whatever. Q4: No it's not. I mean, yes it is, as I didn't say zero, I said practically zero. But I was serious, I hardly know any jolly Fats. And in all honesty, I've always assumed California fatties would be less jolly than non-Californian fatties. Perhaps you're mistaking the jovial shaking of their massive bosoms for real jolliness? Q5: Don't mention it. Q6: That means nothing except that people who acknowledge the possibility that they're sexist and fatsist are likely less sexist and fatsist than you are.
Re: a comment on a note to the politically inactive fundamentalist christians by i_am_the_popsicle	zodiac 212.118.14.17	9-Mar-05/4:15 AM
I think you could clear up the issue by making infants, born or not, legally killable up until they demonstrate some agreed-upon characteristic of selfhood, like a sense of humour or preference for certain kinds of pulped foods, to name two. That would have the extra advantage of pressuring people to acquire selves at a young age, lest they be knocked off by roving Personality Squads.
Re: a comment on Disable by -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I.	-=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. 81.153.196.50	9-Mar-05/4:09 AM
Are you talking about -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I.'s reading of nentwined's appalling dumpling "Iterated Fuck" http://www.poemranker.com/poem-details.jsp?id=40804 , or are you talking about the Dick Bumston readings? To my knowledge, there are no live links to any of these soilings, save the second Dick Bumston story, which is available here: http://jowls.org/audio/dickbumstonstory2.ogg . Access to "Iterated Fuck", the first dick bumston story, and "The Dick Bumston Groove Scenario" would have to be arranged via some predisclosed communications channel, such as an email address.
Re: a comment on a note to the politically inactive fundamentalist christians by i_am_the_popsicle	zodiac 212.118.14.17	9-Mar-05/4:06 AM
God, no! Can you imagine what it would have to say about all of our internals?!?!
Re: a comment on Beetwen by Dovina	zodiac 212.118.14.17	9-Mar-05/4:04 AM
Yes, if by "sex" you mean "gender, particularly female." If you mean "good sex", then bow'ls. You've been writing about wanting to (and not succeeding at) getting laid for almost a year now.
Re: a comment on Beetwen by Dovina	zodiac 212.118.14.17	9-Mar-05/4:03 AM
He probably means "you konw a wrod by its frist and lsat letetrs" is bunk. Which it is. Even you don't believe that; you believe "you konw a wrod by its frist and lsat letetrs as lnog as teh lttrse bwteeen are hte smae." And even that's not the case.
Re: a comment on Half Empty, Half Whole by Rainbow_chaser	richa 81.178.193.41	9-Mar-05/2:44 AM
Don't be ridiculous. If you write to get rid of an emotional block (whatever overblown, melodramatic and ultimately meaningless buncombe that is) then when you have finished simply throw it in the bin. You have moved the emotional block and we all hear no more about it. I understand that you haver managed to distil emotion to its purest form, ace. If I had read this poem without you telling me this I would have thought it was just another bumbling misappropriation of the English language. Now that you have used the magic words fibre, core and pure, I understand how wrong I would have been. The reason weighing on the soul is wrong is because the soul is an abstract idea that you have made no attempt to get to grips with. You have merely said 'soul' which you believe is enough to evoke some kind of empathy for your deep suffering. It isn't. By the way 'writters' is spelt 'writers'. The word you attempted is aptly enough as close to witters as writers.
Re: don't know by the_poetess	leonxic 204.218.244.11	9-Mar-05/2:34 AM
Noone will ever understand your pain. LOL!!!!11
Re: a comment on Fat girls Who Wear Short Skirts During Winter Quarter by DurtKL	Stephen Robins 213.146.148.199	9-Mar-05/1:31 AM
Cardiff, the capital city of Wales (an EU sponsored principality of England), is a city rife with the corpulent females you describe above. On a Saturday night I have found myself face to breast with their bulbous, pallid, vein infused flesh. I feel your poem lacks commentary on the fact pretty much every chap in the world has ended up jockeying one of these engorged gwats when he has had little too much sauce.
Re: wishes by the_poetess	thepinkbunnyofdoom 4.224.30.149	8-Mar-05/10:12 PM
I've read everything you've written up to date, and found two things. A) You need to use spell check. I tend to overlook a typo here or there(I mean come on they happen) but for the love of Buddha, save us the eyes strain. B) You can't be out of high school yet, are you? Your writting has the arrogant tone of someone who thinks they are a genius, but is still being taught. I'm guessing that you tend to read the materials during class, but fail to do the homework more often than not. This is by far the most poetic (and best)thing you've written to date. -8- <3 Jason
Re: A Nation by the_poetess	thepinkbunnyofdoom 4.224.30.149	8-Mar-05/9:58 PM
lol, America coming undone? I like how you started this, but it was too long and detailed and I believe you lost your own point along the way. -7- Because there was some thought and attempts at being poetic here, but mainly because you did some of your homework. But mostly this comes off as the rantings of someone who thinks they understand whats going on in life, but in all actually doesn't.
Re: Lesson in Wickedness by eyrbare	MacFrantic 152.163.100.67	8-Mar-05/9:53 PM
good. *9*
Re: genious by the_poetess	thepinkbunnyofdoom 4.224.30.149	8-Mar-05/9:35 PM
Genius, I believe the word you want is Genius, and I wouldn't call myself one until I could at least spell it. Yea... people do worry about saving the world. I imagine them to be able write with better depth than this though. You have the potential, if you trimmed what you had and fleshed it out properly to have a nice piece here. But as it is, its crap. I do however like the underlying Arrogant tone to this though. -3- <3 Jason P.S. You won't make many friend is life by dropping zeros on people and not at least leaving a reason why you thought the piece in question sucked.