wCUNTw
replying on âIf It Donât Feel Rightâ by kalikopeli
24 May 2003, 8:09 AM
Read my new poem ("Doug Soderstrom")----it's a WINNER!
Read my new poem ("Doug Soderstrom")----it's a WINNER!
Read my new poem ("Doug Soderstrom")----it's a WINNER!
Read my new poem ("Doug Soderstrom")----it's a WINNER!
Read my new poem ("Doug Soderstrom")----it's a WINNER!
Interesting. Perhaps you could write a poem about how people attempt to explain the "salvation versus works" dilemma. The dilemma is stark. Religious fundamentalists, it seems, repeatedly fail in explaining why unsaved people should go to Hell, whilst Christian Humanists attempt to explain why unsaved people should not go to Hell. The poem could also deal with how the religious fundamentalist copes with the cognitive dissonance which seems such an inherent part of this dilemma. In my view, the cognitive dissonance may well be an inherent part of trying to rationally justify why one who has lived a life of moral excellence, yet who is unsaved, should be expected to spend an eternity in Hell. What do you think?
Have a look at this. It will tell you all you need to know.
http://www.poemranker.com/poem-details.j
Let me pass on to you the one thing I've learned about this place. No-one here is exactly what he appears. Not horus8, not Shardik, not nentwined, and not -=Dark_Angel=-. You are though. You're an idiot. Consider this:
1) You could care less what horus8 thinks of your poetry.
2) There is a possible amount of caring lower than the amount you have. (1)
3) You could not care less than not caring at all.
4) There is no possible amount of caring lower than not caring at all (having zero care). (3)
5) The amount you care does not equal zero. (2,4)
6) You care what horus8 thinks of your poetry. (5)
Forest is spelt with olny one r = forest
I hate anything that contains Spanish-sounding names.
I fear you have again confused -=Dark_Angel=- with beakism. I thought we had got over that misunderstanding. Perhaps you have trouble with the concept because you have so many usernames.
What are you talking about? This doesn't say anything about war. It just expresses a vague anti-war sentiment that doesn't have any propositional content. The only function of this haiku is to confirm the prejudices of whoever reads it. It is perfect for the job because it says nothing but it contains the word 'children' so people like you think it must be meaningful.
lol
Are you some kind of futuristic troll? Why do all your poems rhyme "love" with "above" and use the exact same rhyming and scanning schemes? And who is this mystery publisher? This all sounds like the time I tried to butter myself up and squeeze into the Parson's skirtingboard...
As I have said before, I never claimed to be the best writer in the world. Also as I have said before, this is not one of the best poems I have written. I think that if you feel so strongly about the way I have written this I would really like to see an example of how you would have written this. I have read some of the poetry you have written on this sight and you are a talented writer, so I would love to see a better version of this poem.
This is far from one of what I would consider my best poems. So I all but agree with your comment. But I would like to know who poetry.com is as I have never heard of them. From what you have written I am guessing they are some sort of internet scam company. I did not find a publisher via the internet, I found him by accident to be honest.
I would suggest not smoking pot out of cans for a while mate.
Spell check while your loitering there could you, because this poem is riddled with err.
But do you have doves nesting in your bat cave?
Using my plush and painstakingly monitored produce section to vegetate novices is flattering, but strickly forbidden, but if you would like to touch my Kale with your brittle mite invested down feathers to test it's spring go right ahead, but i need my turnips to combat the Sars in my hall closet, thanks.