simone_girard
replying on Symbol Of Love by simone_girard
23 May 2003, 7:19 PM
What is it with you. Do you always have to stand up for Shardik. Is he so fucking dumb that he cant reply himself. As for your comments on my poetry I could care less what you think of it. The only reason it is her is so that people with an intelligent comment can have there say. This in idiots terms ( just for you and your bum buddy) means if you hate it tell me why and how to improve it. I am the first to admit that I am far from the greatest writer in the world. My spelling sucks, My vocab is pretty limited and my imagination is probably not vivid enough. But that doesnt mean that you or anyone else has the write to put shit on me. I put my poetry on here to have shit put on at at times, not me. If i wanted you or your friends to put shit on me I would have put myself on here.
For spamming I give you a zero. And I didn't read your poem either.
Aren't you a little short for a stormtrooper?
Good grief! If this so-called "inner flame" had anything to do with the enormously long chain of wrong thoughts you must have been thinking in order to produce a poeme as stultifyingly cack as this one, then it should immediately be snuffed out with a giant turnip.
rice / 10
Furthermore, "diamondwife", if that is your real pseudonym, I would like to hear your account of what constitutes depth for emotions. If it's anything like your face it will be horribly awry and liable to collapse into a husk of its former self, but I think we should at least air it out before it starts decaying and stinking up the fucking place.
Really Jeremi, your attempts to emulate my mock-archaic stylings are ill-informed, to say the least. Olden folk wouldn't have called lotion 'lotione'. They would have called it 'Dr Carawax's Orphobismic Ointment'.
By the way, this poeme is so hideously awful that the only people who could possibly agree to publish it are poetry.com, and the less said about them the better. Actually the more said about them the better.
1. They publish anything you send to them because they want you to buy the book at a ridiculous price.
2. They run poetry competitions to make people think they're good at poetry so they'll buy the poetry books poetry.com constantly secretes.
3. They are gay to the fucking max.
Thanks for your time!
Oh come on, diamondwife! You know very well that this poeme is completely ace - it's being published for Christ's sake! I think you're just jealous that simone has found a publisher and are lashing out in frustration at everyone else on poemeranker. Grow up, for pity's sake!
It's just NOT GOOD! Your reply to me does not change that. It is no reflection on you as a person. I believe you probably do have deeper feelings, maybe you just haven't developed the skill to get those feelings across through the written word. Look at the votes and comments. ALL of the comments are negative. Your votes include two 0s and a 2.
The language is in need of some maturing, but the ending is good. Still needs work, but moving along.
You've succeeded in avoiding every theological philosophy straight down the board. Good Job! What exactly were you attempting to clarify with this piece doug? Proof you're asleep while you're awake?
Stop telling everyone, everywhere, to read this. It's atrociously bad.
stupidest ode ive read in a while, funny thouhg
Read Soderstrom's new poem (Theology)----it's great!
Read Soderstrom's new poem (Theology)----it's great!
Read Soderstrom's new poem (Theology)----it's great!
Read Soderstrom's new poem (Theology)----it's great!
Read Soderstrom's new poem (Theology)----it's great!
Read Soderstrom's new poem (Theology)----it's great!