horus8
on Into My World by sliver
21 Dec 2004, 4:34 PM
Any fuck that cries on a rose, and then tries to turn it into shit poetry should be SHOT.
funny, sad
You did an amazing job or horrible rhymes and nailing the (limited) point through the coffin well into the opposite end of the world.
It seems like you're mind's pretty organized if it can hammer on that one point 10 rhyming lines. Or is it just that you'd forgotten you'd written the previous two each time?
Sorry, thought you were using it as an adjective.
Thank you for reposting this and for the kind sentiment.
Your best so far. Quite good.
no comma after bring.
"No longer will I look, without regret," is a bit clunky.
I'll give it another -10- because I know this man very well, and what he's going through.
If it was me I don't think i could handle it the way he does, but I give him the utmost respect.
Dovina I posted the poem he worte for you. this poem is wonderful that you wrote for him. the only thing is that he had a seizure today, and went into a coma. I will e-mail you. Felicia
I had to edit it about the blank canvas part. Other wise you have to look past the "canvas" part of the poem. It's about a person depressed trying to fit in "palette decorated" her makeup "nightmarish dreams" gothic
Her memories are of before with the evening dining and star lit sparkled eyes. That describes her old memories of joy. Manifested demons trying unworldly times.....nothing is going right. Her tears over flowing into the puddle she’s all alone.....
Thank you, too.
Thank you, Fraser.
A bit over the top. A blank canvas sits untouched because it's blank; unveiled, but we see it. Tears overflowing from what? Palette decorated nightmarish dreams, and starlit eyes - outside then. Still a haunting vision.
That is so lovely.-10-
nentwined
on Distastefully Hairy Quendo by wââ¦â©â¤â¦â©â£
â â¤â¦â§â©â¡w 21 Dec 2004, 12:53 PM
â â¤â¦â§â©â¡w 21 Dec 2004, 12:53 PM
I think the second It's should be spelled out, for rhythmic purposes.
Unless you're shouting it, then it's all clean in the wash.
Ah but the title of his poeme was "Vegetable Poeme", not "Vegetables Poeme". 'twould be folly indeede to expect more than one vegetable in a "Vegetable Poeme"... unless by "Vegetable" he means "Vegetable, as an abstract concept" :(
I enjoyed this piece (esspecially the conclusion). 9