Stephen Robins
replying on Cassius by helenwales
27 Sep 2004, 5:07 AM
Wazzook
Maybe you should try explaining it to yourself, you fucking numbwad. You just botched it all over. Now, before you go spitting all over the place, clunking your head on nearly every thing, please take a look at your comment of 19-Sep-04 and tell me which of the dimtard parts of your above "syllogism" most closely matches your blundering rambles of that date, and which one you were supposed to be proving. And if you're thinking of mouthing off about the musical proficiency of bumming the constable again please take a long flying run into a very near wall.
PS-Obviously "Kenneth Tynan is anything other than an funny shaped pole-hat" is bow'ls. Why don't you try naming me one good critic?
A hobo mutes
Wet cocaINE
That was the best poem I read today and forever. You got so much talent.
Yawn.
You're a fuck wad too.
-7- For shock
For some reason I can't bring myself to think the last stanza fits. Though I love the 'Kissed her lips on the ashes of blossom'. For some reason it doesn't seem to work rhythmically. Also, while the whole wheel of time moving around, as was done before so shall be done again, etc theme works (i.e. you kissing your lover where your parents kissed etc.), it seems a touch clichéd. It makes me think too much of 'Songs my Mother Taught Me' in that respect.
There's also the fact that I sort of would have liked it if you'd found a way of ending it without bringing yourself into play. 8 for now because I'm a miserable shite and the score's high enough as it is already.
with a score that high, i was a little more than skeptical, but this is great. It's like an epic and exaclty what poetry should be. It reminds me of famous poems that people spend their lives examining to find the meaning that was present all along. It's a 10, u deserve it :)
If ace poets were crap critics they would throw away all their good ideas and keep all their bad ones. Do I have to talk you through the logical fallacy of affirming the consequent again?
A good poet is a good critic.
Kenneth Tynan is a good critic.
Kenneth Tynan is a good poet.
is bowl's.
If only we could all laugh about poems about aids a bit more I feel certain a cure will be found. It is very important we put aside the childishness of reverence and solemnity, gentlemanly ideals. Laugh about aids, our grandfathers do!
That's not at all what this poem is about or for. My guess is that it's about glass safety and the desperate efforts of homos to get off by anal insertion - neither of which problems, in my opinion, receives the media attention it needs. Thanks for trying, though! And hey, welcome to poemranker!
I've just checked the last 300 posts by horus8, aka Jeremi Handrinos, aka Baba Yaga, aka et cetera et cetera, and found your accusations to be true. If you're ready I'm willing to back you up in approaching nentwined about this serious misuse of poemranker resources. Please send a draft protest letter to my email address, which is posted on my personal homepage, here:
http://www.aineotheos.org/
Thanks for your courage and dedication to the ideal of poemranker,
Your friend in Christ,
zodiac
The-Krack, Islamicka
any "green" ripe a pluck,like the above consumated in flesh is worth the "ticklishing" in the mouth.
if nuts gets opened, the screw-driving is well done.
only that, after the "dance" .... whose's flesh wears the "plasters" and who pays the bill for the pains.
Please name for me one good critic that you know of besides some sad teenager who's spat vaguely praiseful comments on one of your poemranker posts.
PS-Is Roger Ebert a good filmmaker? Was Coleridge a good poet?
I can't be bothered to read this poem but I'm going to vote anyway