on For W. by A. Nomaly
12 Oct 2003, 7:31 PM
line breaks--why? no werkie, comme ca.
on some deleted poem
13 Oct 2003, 12:10 PM
mead and head--no.
on Not On Your Nelly by Wobble McFly
13 Oct 2003, 12:17 PM
indeed. what inspired said muck?
on Ù
صادر ÙÙØ³Ø·ÙÙÙØ© Ø£Ù Ø§ÙØ§ØØªÙا٠by Wobble McFly
13 Oct 2003, 12:18 PM
"ÙØ¬Ùاد Ø§ÙØ¥Ø³ÙاÙ
Ù Ù٠بÙ"????
no way!!!
no way!!!
on some deleted poem
15 Oct 2003, 8:07 AM
this is not your sport, 195.157.153.253
on Facing Goodbye by Caducus
15 Oct 2003, 9:25 AM
CAD,
nice start.
this is a lovely tribute, but in terms off its poetics, it could use a revamp. the last stanza is definitely the weakest.
good to see you writing again.
nice start.
this is a lovely tribute, but in terms off its poetics, it could use a revamp. the last stanza is definitely the weakest.
good to see you writing again.
on Pet Hatreds by Bobjim
15 Oct 2003, 10:43 AM
how wonderfully ironic!
on Kites, Gunpowder, and a Chair by Geschäftsreise
15 Oct 2003, 10:44 AM
not to be televised, live.
on Kites, Gunpowder, and a Chair by Geschäftsreise
15 Oct 2003, 10:45 AM
one who?
on Toku by Bill Z Bub
21 Oct 2003, 4:56 PM
on some deleted poem
22 Oct 2003, 12:05 PM
<<Referrer: crystal lane swift>>
nuff said.
nuff said.
on some deleted poem
22 Oct 2003, 10:29 PM
no.
no?
no.
no?
no.
on some deleted poem
22 Oct 2003, 10:35 PM
WOW!!!!!11
MEDIOCRITY CODE
31F49081
MEDIOCRITY CODE
31F49081
on My deepest thoughts by poetandknowit
24 Oct 2003, 6:51 PM
Behave yourself, Senor Burro!!!!!!!
on some deleted poem
24 Oct 2003, 7:13 PM
i love monkey love!!!!
but i am screwed down too tight for this poem.
but i am screwed down too tight for this poem.
on some deleted poem
24 Oct 2003, 8:27 PM
much tighter! much nicer.
more painterly, but concisely so.
i especially liked this:
--but her fieldstone wings spread
--yet like wide skirts on gowns
--a hundred years gone.
more painterly, but concisely so.
i especially liked this:
--but her fieldstone wings spread
--yet like wide skirts on gowns
--a hundred years gone.
on Teaching Beetles To Swim by Bobjim
28 Oct 2003, 8:29 AM
i enjoyed this more than anything i have read here in months. thank you.
only one line interfered with my pleasure:
"That it's them sing (not me),"
i thing should be reanimated to:
It's them that sing, (not me),
only one line interfered with my pleasure:
"That it's them sing (not me),"
i thing should be reanimated to:
It's them that sing, (not me),